Föderation EN Di 29.10.2024 01:50:42 @renchap poking at the new #otel support in 4.3.0, and there's a bunch of neat data here. yay! is there any value in keeping these repeated ZSCAN traces? they're the vast majority of our current event usage, and they don't seem to be terribly meaningful. usually (maybe exclusively) just a span that says ZSCAN. safe to drop these? i don't think we'll lose any meaningful observability by doing so? Medien: 2 |
Föderation EN Di 29.10.2024 02:15:12 @esk having used sidekiq before Iβd say drop them and/or heavily sample them if you can. It should just be Sidekiq looking for jobs in sorted order. Itβs something that would be nice to have a metric for to know if itβs starting to bog down workers or something, but a span for them all is a bit much IMO. Also yay Honeycomb!! |
Föderation EN Di 29.10.2024 09:44:53 @esk Are they part of a trace, and/or do they have a parent span? |
Föderation EN Di 29.10.2024 15:13:25 @renchap they seem to be the full trace - no parent/children that I can find (granted, i'm a big honeycomb noob). we plan to turn on sampling for things here shortly to make the total number of traces less... overwhelming. :) |
Föderation EN Di 29.10.2024 16:21:08 @esk So this can probably be dropped, and if you can open a PR on the Mastodon repo that either heavily sample or maybe drop those single calls, it will probably get merged as I dont really see how those would be useful. |